Most HR teams have a defined approach to I-9 verification. What often surprises them is how differently that process actually operates across hiring managers, locations, and onboarding workflows.
One manager reviews documents one way. Another location relies on an authorized representative. Remote hires introduce additional steps and documentation.
Over time, these differences create a process that appears consistent on paper but operates very differently in practice. During an inspection, that's exactly what investigators examine.
In this session, you'll learn how HR teams identify where their I-9 practices diverge from policy — and how to strengthen oversight before an inspection exposes those gaps.
No inspection prep. No jargon. Just a clear look at where exposure builds and what to do about it.
Recorded March 26, 2026 | Watch On Demand Presenters: Tanya Jeter & Brian Egan
Compliance gaps rarely appear in the policy manual. They develop in the day-to-day reality of onboarding at scale — where hiring managers, locations, and remote processes introduce subtle variation that drifts away from policy over time.
During an inspection, those gaps become visible quickly.
Inconsistent Manager Practices
Different hiring managers apply different standards when reviewing documents, creating uneven verification records across the organization.
Multi-Location Variation
What’s standard at headquarters may be handled very differently at regional offices, branch locations, or franchise operations.
Remote Hire Complexity
Authorized representatives introduce additional steps and documentation requirements that often go untracked in distributed onboarding workflows.
The Inspection Gap
Investigators evaluate process consistency not just form completion. A process that appears uniform on paper may reveal significant discrepancies under review.
Tanya brings direct experience working alongside HR and compliance teams responsible for hiring at scale where remote onboarding, distributed verification, and multi-location hiring introduce complexity into I-9 processes.
Brian brings five years of experience advising large organizations on immigration compliance and I-9 program management. He helps technology, healthcare, and higher education employers strengthen verification processes, remediate I-9 records, and prepare for ICE audits.
Where I-9 inconsistencies accumulate inside distributed onboarding workflows — and why they're difficult to detect before an inspection surfaces them.
Beyond form completion. Learn what ICE and DOJ auditors evaluate when reviewing process consistency across managers, locations, and hire types.
Practical approaches HR teams use to align day-to-day verification practices with policy — including oversight strategies for remote and multi-location hiring operations.

This session is designed for:
HR and Compliance leaders responsible for I-9 oversight
Talent Acquisition leaders managing distributed or high-volume hiring
HR teams supporting multi-location or remote onboarding operations
Ready to go deeper? Request a complimentary 30-minute I-9 Readiness Walkthrough — a private, no-obligation conversation to:
Map how your current I-9 process actually works end to end
Identify where errors, omissions, or reverification gaps are creating legal exposure
Understand what audit-ready I-9 compliance looks like at your hiring volume
Most teams use this simply to confirm they're on the right track.
Most exposure doesn't show up in your policy manual. It shows up when an investigator starts asking questions.
Watch this session to see where I-9 risk builds in modern hiring workflows — and what HR teams are doing to get ahead of it before an inspection forces the conversation.
©2026 Mitratech, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy